Hey Democrats: Marsh, Saslaw, Howell, Lucas, Edwards, Puller, Deeds - next time a criminal illegal alien, in your district, murders/rapes/robs a constituent of yours, how will you explain to the victim’s family that you didn’t think Gov. Kaine needed to bother to work with the Feds to deport the criminal illegal alien perpetrator?
Not only should you have voted for this on the grounds that it was, you know, the right thing to do, but has it occurred to you that such a victim or victim’s family could sue the Commonwealth for not taking advantage of these 287(g)s to help expel criminal illegal aliens? I’m not a lawyer, but that looks like a pretty good lawsuit to me.
What’s the deal? I thought Democrats were always for the downtrodden? the victim? the little guys? the voiceless people of our society?
Oh wait, I’m starting to get it - you think criminal illegal aliens ARE victims. Okay, then.
NOT.
Hey Creigh Deeds - thinking about a run for Governor? Do you think this is going to come up again in ads (against you) made by the next Republican gubernatorial nominee? Oh yes, it is. Count on it.
Here’s a nice info sheet on the 287(g)s. Some of what signing the 287(g)s would make possible:
State and local patrol officers, detectives, investigators and correctional officers working in conjunction with ICE gain: necessary resources and authority to pursue investigations relating to violent crimes, human smuggling, gang/organized crime activity, sexual-related offenses, narcotics smuggling and money laundering; and support in more remote geographical locations.
But Democrats don’t want state and local law enforcement folks to have those resources, I guess. What else are we supposed to think, looking at a vote like this?
BVBL is also blogging HB 623.